Connectivity: 100%
The following nameservers are available and responding correctly for DNS queries for your domain vast.bank.
Nameserver | IP address(es) | SOA serial |
---|---|---|
ns2.vast.bank. |
194.58.198.54
2a01:3f1:3054::53 |
3037 |
ns3.vast.bank. |
185.42.137.105
2a01:3f0:400::54 |
3037 |
ns4.vast.bank. |
194.58.196.54
2a01:3f1:854::53 |
3037 |
Good news, no warnings or errors were found.
We could not find any recommendations at this time.
Good news, we detected the following achievements in your DNS configuration. Each of these checks has increased your DNS Spy score.
- All nameservers reply with the same SOA serial number.
- The nameserver IPs are distributed across multiple subnets.
- All nameservers are online.
- Nameservers are available over IPv4.
- Nameservers are available over IPv6.
Performance: 100%
We tested each nameserver and measured the following response times.
Nameserver | IP address(es) | Response time |
---|---|---|
ns2.vast.bank. |
194.58.198.54
2a01:3f1:3054::53 |
1ms
3ms |
ns3.vast.bank. |
185.42.137.105
2a01:3f0:400::54 |
7ms
7ms |
ns4.vast.bank. |
194.58.196.54
2a01:3f1:854::53 |
7ms
7ms |
Good news, no warnings or errors were found.
We could not find any recommendations at this time.
Good news, we detected the following achievements in your DNS configuration. Each of these checks has increased your DNS Spy score.
- Nameserver ns2.vast.bank. (194.58.198.54) replied quickly (< 50ms).
- Nameserver ns2.vast.bank. (2a01:3f1:3054::53) replied in a reasonable time.
- Nameserver ns3.vast.bank. (185.42.137.105) replied quickly (< 50ms).
- Nameserver ns3.vast.bank. (2a01:3f0:400::54) replied in a reasonable time.
- Nameserver ns4.vast.bank. (194.58.196.54) replied quickly (< 50ms).
- Nameserver ns4.vast.bank. (2a01:3f1:854::53) replied in a reasonable time.
Resilience & Security: 100%
These are the locations and providers of your nameservers.
Nameserver | Location | ISP |
---|---|---|
ns2.vast.bank. |
IPv4: SE
IPv6: SE |
AS56908 - NETNOD-NDS $Id: aut-num_AS56908,v 1.1 20160307 11:15:51 mem Exp $, SE
AS56908 - NETNOD-NDS $Id: aut-num_AS56908,v 1.1 20160307 11:15:51 mem Exp $, SE |
ns3.vast.bank. |
IPv4: SE
IPv6: SE |
AS8674 - NETNOD-IX Netnod AB, SE
AS8674 - NETNOD-IX Netnod AB, SE |
ns4.vast.bank. |
IPv4: SE
IPv6: SE |
AS8674 - NETNOD-IX Netnod AB, SE
AS8674 - NETNOD-IX Netnod AB, SE |
Good news, no warnings or errors were found.
We detected some possible recommendations for you to consider. No penalties were given for these, but resolving them can give you a higher DNS score.
- All IPv4 nameservers appear to be hosted in the same country (SE). You might want to consider spreading the nameservers geographically.
- All IPv6 nameservers appear to be hosted in the same country (SE). You might want to consider spreading the nameservers geographically.
- No CAA records found. Consider adding CAA records, as it adds increased security by limiting which Certificate Authorities can issue certificates for this domain. (more info)
Good news, we detected the following achievements in your DNS configuration. Each of these checks has increased your DNS Spy score.
- You have more than 1 nameserver.
- The IPv4 nameservers are distributed among multiple providers.
- The IPv6 nameservers are distributed among multiple providers.
- DNSSEC is enabled.
- You are using glue records, this will speed up the initial DNS requests.
DNS records: 100%
Our scans detected the following publicly available DNS records.
Record | TTL | Value | |
---|---|---|---|
A | vast.bank | 1h | 178.79.178.218 |
AAAA | vast.bank | 1h | 2a01:7e00:e000:3f7:: |
DNSKEY | vast.bank | 5m | KSK | ECDSA Curve P-256 with SHA-256 | bGzlz3e6inkVuOQc3z3tB693bZ5+gE5VKF/KiT1Td1vGh+yjjys3yRpT +Gb4K9eVSXD/+wfCtU2wnOHN6tyjiQ== |
MX | vast.bank | 1h | 0 vast-bank.mail.protection.outlook.com. |
NS | vast.bank | 1h |
ns2.vast.bank. ns3.vast.bank. ns4.vast.bank. |
SOA | vast.bank | 1h | ns2.vast.bank. dnsmaster.vast.bank. 3037 604800 3600 1209600 300 |
TXT | vast.bank | 5m |
"" "Bf4Rjs0u/bTaGKBVKUt+LzrvMbIku2Kx1E42DtW2j5Cfw45oY8QptnFr9SRLveZuU0K4YVIdJu6TV8W8l9n09g==" "MS=3FD02F4BBA36E131A3CCCE6E228FF9292D30D6D7" "O8/cK3d3nZpdsSuOevX1DJaWwMfzMB6jlsQ7G7rXigIrqXoAaOUd0zS4F/ZXYyvQ9BDNKKlqz2+GtHvZJKTkhg==" "amazonses:NkY62HsDHDeig/WOxghekb/8+uYbNbKQtDz6xZJ94Ek=" "apple-domain-verification=BCraRSDdeKbWP3x1" "atlassian-domain-verification=2EhkKnPGJEBKvCcdaieLRHcHAwVx5d9TOJVW6a1iYbPjCKfx8BZbae270o7UsTGo" "f+8CAY8wfaOXtsdSteyCKA==" "v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email include:spfref.jackhenry.com ~all" |
TXT | _amazonses.vast.bank | 1h | "NkY62HsDHDeig/WOxghekb/8+uYbNbKQtDz6xZJ94Ek=" |
CNAME | enterpriseenrollment.vast.bank | 1h | enterpriseenrollment.manage.microsoft.com. |
CNAME | enterpriseregistration.vast.bank | 1h | enterpriseregistration.windows.net. |
CNAME | lyncdiscover.vast.bank | 1h | webdir.online.lync.com. |
A | mail.vast.bank | 1h | 208.95.202.235 |
A | ns2.vast.bank | 1h | 194.58.198.54 |
AAAA | ns2.vast.bank | 1h | 2a01:3f1:3054::53 |
A | ns3.vast.bank | 1h | 185.42.137.105 |
AAAA | ns3.vast.bank | 1h | 2a01:3f0:400::54 |
A | ns4.vast.bank | 1h | 194.58.196.54 |
AAAA | ns4.vast.bank | 1h | 2a01:3f1:854::53 |
CNAME | sip.vast.bank | 1h | sipdir.online.lync.com. |
A | smtp.vast.bank | 1h | 208.95.202.235 |
CNAME | www.vast.bank | 1h | 3927709.group9.sites.hubspot.net. |
Good news, no warnings or errors were found.
We detected some possible recommendations for you to consider. No penalties were given for these, but resolving them can give you a higher DNS score.
- No DMARC records have been found. Consider configuring DMARC for improved e-mail authentication.
Good news, we detected the following achievements in your DNS configuration. Each of these checks has increased your DNS Spy score.
- Single MX record but with multiple IPs associated to it.
- The MX record for "vast.bank" has a long TTL (1h+).
- The NS records have a long TTL (1h+).
- SPF records have been found.
- SPF records are set up restrictively.
- Found a root (apex) DNS record.
- Found a www DNS record.
- Found an IPv6 root DNS record.
- The active nameservers match the NS records.
- The DNS records appear to be RFC compliant.
Have a look at other public DNS scans.